Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This feasibility study developed a weight management intervention for men that was acceptable and feasible to deliver and met its criteria to progress to a full trial.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Stephan U Dombrowski 1,2,*, Matthew McDonald 3, Marjon van der Pol 4, Mark Grindle 5, Alison Avenell 6, Paula Carroll 7, Eileen Calveley 3, Andrew Elders 8, Nicola Glennie 3, Cindy M Gray 9, Fiona M Harris 3, Adrian Hapca 10, Claire Jones 11, Frank Kee 12, Michelle C McKinley 13, Rebecca Skinner 2, Martin Tod 14, Pat Hoddinott 3

1 Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
2 Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
3 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
4 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
5 Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
6 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
7 Men’s Health Forum in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
8 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
9 Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
10 Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
11 Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
12 Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
13 Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
14 Men’s Health Forum, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: stephan.dombrowski@unb.ca

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions