Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study showed a full trial of postnatal weight management interventions is feasible with improvements including providing more information about the intervention at recruitment and a longer intervention duration.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Debra Bick 1,2,*, Cath Taylor 3, Vanita Bhavnani 4, Andy Healey 5, Paul Seed 2, Sarah Roberts 5, Magdalena Zasada 3, Amanda Avery 6, Victoria Craig 7, Nina Khazaezadah 7, Sarah McMullen 4, Sheila O’Connor 7, Bimpe Oki 8, Eugene Oteng-Ntim 7, Lucilla Poston 2, Michael Ussher 9,10

1 Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
2 Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
3 School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
4 NCT, London, UK
5 King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
6 Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
7 Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8 Public Health, London Borough of Lambeth, London, UK
9 Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
10 Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions