Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

This study found that the peer-led intervention and methods were feasible and acceptable to participants, although some modifications are required prior to a full trial.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Mark A Tully 1,2,3,4,*, Conor Cunningham 1,2, Ashlene Wright 1,2, Ilona McMullan 2,4, Julie Doherty 5, Debbie Collins 6, Catrine Tudor-Locke 7, Joanne Morgan 2,8, Glenn Phair 9, Bob Laventure 10, Ellen E A Simpson 5, Suzanne M McDonough 2,4,11, Evie Gardner 9, Frank Kee 1,2, Marie H Murphy 12, Ashley Agus 9, Ruth F Hunter 1,2, Wendy Hardeman 13, Margaret E Cupples 1,2

1 Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 UK Clinical Research Collaboration, Centre of Excellence for Public Health Northern Ireland, Belfast, UK
3 Institute of Mental Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
4 Centre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Institute of Nursing and Health, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
5 Psychology Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
6 Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
7 Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
8 Community Development and Health Network, Newry, UK
9 Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, The Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK
10 Later Life Training Ltd, Amble, UK
11 School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
12 Centre for Physical Activity and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
13 Health Promotion Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
* Corresponding author Email: m.tully@ulster.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions