Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found no benefit from the woodland environment interventions for community-level mental health within 6 months of completion.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Catharine Ward Thompson, Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira, Sara Tilley, Aldo Elizalde, Willings Botha, Andrew Briggs, Steven Cummins, Alastair H Leyland, Jenny J Roe, Peter Aspinall, Katherine Brookfield & Richard Mitchell.

Catharine Ward Thompson 1,*, Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira 1, Sara Tilley 1, Aldo Elizalde 2,3, Willings Botha 4,5, Andrew Briggs 4, Steven Cummins 6, Alastair H Leyland 2, Jenny J Roe 7,8,9, Peter Aspinall 7, Katherine Brookfield 1, Richard Mitchell 2

1 OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
3 Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
4 Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
5 National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
6 Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
7 School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
8 Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, York, UK
9 Center for Design and Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions