Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The impact of home energy efficiency programmes on population health has been modest, and changes to the housing stock are required to realise the potential benefits for improving health.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ben Armstrong, Oliver Bonnington, Zaid Chalabi, Michael Davies, Yvonne Doyle, James Goodwin, Judith Green, Shakoor Hajat, Ian Hamilton, Emma Hutchinson, Anna Mavrogianni, James Milner, Ai Milojevic, Roberto Picetti, Nirandeep Rehill, Christophe Sarran, Clive Shrubsole, Phil Symonds, Jonathon Taylor & Paul Wilkinson.

Ben Armstrong 1, Oliver Bonnington 2, Zaid Chalabi 1, Michael Davies 3, Yvonne Doyle 4, James Goodwin 5,6, Judith Green 2,7, Shakoor Hajat 1, Ian Hamilton 6, Emma Hutchinson 1, Anna Mavrogianni 3, James Milner 1, Ai Milojevic 1, Roberto Picetti 1, Nirandeep Rehill 1, Christophe Sarran 8, Clive Shrubsole 3, Phil Symonds 3, Jonathon Taylor 3, Paul Wilkinson 1,*

1 Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2 Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3 Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, University College London, London, UK
4 Public Health England (London), London, UK
5 Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
6 Energy Institute, University College London, London, UK
7 Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
8 The Met Office (Health Programme), Exeter, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions