Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found that speed limit interventions that use signs and lines plus education and promotion can reduce casualties, and have significant public support and compliance once implemented.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ruth Jepson 1,*, Graham Baker 2, Claire Cleland 3, Andy Cope 4, Neil Craig 5, Charlie Foster 6, Ruth Hunter 3, Frank Kee 3, Michael P Kelly 7, Paul Kelly 2, Karen Milton 8, Glenna Nightingale 1, Kieran Turner 1,2, Andrew James Williams 9, James Woodcock 10

1 Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3 School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
4 Sustrans, Bristol, UK
5 Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
6 Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
7 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
8 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
9 School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
10 Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email: ruth.jepson@ed.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

Response by Dr Andrew Williams on 14 March 2024 at 9:01 AM
Corrections to published report

Corrections to the report content since publication. Please see Response to Report document in the Download report documents tab.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions