Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found the intervention may have had a degree of success in improving device-measured physical activity at 6 months compared with health education leaflets, but the difference was not maintained at 16 18 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Stacy A Clemes 1,2,*, Veronica Varela-Mato 1,2, Danielle H Bodicoat 3, Cassandra L Brookes 4, Yu-Ling Chen 1,2, Edward Cox 5, Charlotte L Edwardson 2,6, Laura J Gray 7, Amber Guest 1, Vicki Johnson 8, Fehmidah Munir 1,2, Nicola J Paine 1,2, Gerry Richardson 5, Katharina Ruettger 1, Mohsen Sayyah 1, Aron Sherry 1,2, Ana Suazo Di Paola 4, Jacqui Troughton 8, Simon Walker 5, Thomas Yates 2,6, James King 1,2

1 School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
2 National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
3 Independent researcher, Leicester, UK
4 Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
5 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
6 Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
7 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
8 Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions