Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The trial showed that safetxt messages did not reduce chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections, with slightly more infections in the intervention group.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Caroline Free 1,*, Melissa J Palmer 1, Kimberley Potter 2, Ona L McCarthy 1, Lauren Jerome 2, Sima Berendes 1, Anasztazia Gubijev 1, Megan Knight 2, Zahra Jamal 2, Farandeep Dhaliwal 2, James R Carpenter 3, Tim P Morris 4, Phil Edwards 1, Rebecca French 5, Louis Macgregor 6, Katy ME Turner 6, Paula Baraitser 7, Ford CI Hickson 8, Kaye Wellings 5, Ian Roberts 1, Julia V Bailey 9, Graham Hart 10, Susan Michie 11, Tim Clayton 3, Karen Devries 3

1 Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2 Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3 Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
4 Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
5 Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
6 Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
7 Centre for Global Health, King’s College London, London, UK
8 Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
9 eHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
10 Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
11 Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: caroline.free@lshtm.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions