Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This research programme found mixed evidence on different models of mental health supported accommodation and found that a trial of effectiveness was not feasible.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Helen Killaspy 1,2,*, Stefan Priebe 3,4, Michael King 1, Sandra Eldridge 5, Paul McCrone 6, Geoff Shepherd 7, Maurice Arbuthnott 8, Gerard Leavey 9, Sarah Curtis 10, Peter McPherson 1, Sarah Dowling 1

1 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
2 Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
3 Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, UK
4 East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
5 Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
6 King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Implementing Recovery Through Organisational Change (ImROC), c/o Learning and Development, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
8 North London Service User Research Forum, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
9 Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK
10 Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience, Durham University, Durham, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions