Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This research programme on dementia-care found neither staff training with on-line decision support interventions in care homes, nor treatment from NHS teams in the community, reduced clinically significant challenging behaviour

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Esme Moniz-Cook, Cathryn Hart, Bob Woods, Chris Whitaker, Ian James, Ian Russell, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Andrea Hilton, Martin Orrell, Peter Campion, Graham Stokes, Robert SP Jones, Mike Bird, Fiona Poland & Jill Manthorpe.

Esme Moniz-Cook 1,2,*, Cathryn Hart 2, Bob Woods 3, Chris Whitaker 4, Ian James 5, Ian Russell 6, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards 7, Andrea Hilton 1, Martin Orrell 8, Peter Campion 1, Graham Stokes 9, Robert SP Jones 10, Mike Bird 3, Fiona Poland 11, Jill Manthorpe 12

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
2 Research and Development, Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Hull and East Yorkshire, UK
3 Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
4 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
5 Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Swansea Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
7 Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
8 Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
9 BUPA and University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
10 North Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
11 School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
12 Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions