Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

This multi-method research programme highlighted the importance and challenges of measuring patient experience in primary care and using patient feedback for quality improvement: it identified implications for practice in eight areas.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jenni Burt 1, John Campbell 2, Gary Abel 1,2, Ahmed Aboulghate 1, Faraz Ahmed 1, Anthea Asprey 2, Heather Barry 2, Julia Beckwith 1, John Benson 3, Olga Boiko 2, Pete Bower 4, Raff Calitri 2, Mary Carter 2, Antoinette Davey 2, Marc N Elliott 5, Natasha Elmore 1, Conor Farrington 1, Hena Wali Haque 1, William Henley 2, Val Lattimer 6, Nadia Llanwarne 1, Cathy Lloyd 7, Georgios Lyratzopoulos 1, Inocencio Maramba 2, Luke Mounce 2, Jenny Newbould 1, Charlotte Paddison 1, Richard Parker 3, Suzanne Richards 2, Martin Roberts 2, Claude Setodji 5, Jonathan Silverman 8, Fiona Warren 2, Ed Wilson 1, Christine Wright 2, Martin Roland 1,*

1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
2 University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
3 Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
4 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
6 School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
7 Faculty of Health & Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
8 University of Cambridge Medical School, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email: mr108@medschl.cam.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions