Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

NHS inpatient mental health rehabilitation services successfully support the recovery of service users with complex needs, but the GetREAL intervention did not increase service user rehabilitation activity.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Helen Killaspy, Michael King, Frank Holloway, Thomas J Craig, Sarah Cook, Tim Mundy, Gerard Leavey, Paul McCrone, Leonardo Koeser, Rumana Omar, Louise Marston, Maurice Arbuthnott, Nicholas Green, Isobel Harrison, Melanie Lean, Melanie Gee & Sadiq Bhanbhro.

Helen Killaspy 1,2,*, Michael King 1,2, Frank Holloway 3, Thomas J Craig 3,4, Sarah Cook 5, Tim Mundy 6, Gerard Leavey 7, Paul McCrone 8, Leonardo Koeser 8, Rumana Omar 9, Louise Marston 10, Maurice Arbuthnott 11, Nicholas Green 1, Isobel Harrison 1, Melanie Lean 1, Melanie Gee 5, Sadiq Bhanbhro 5

1 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
2 Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
4 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
5 Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
6 Centre for Leadership in Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
7 Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
8 David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
9 Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
10 Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
11 North London Service User Research Forum, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: h.killaspy@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions