Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The addition of social recovery therapy did not significantly increase weekly hours in structured activity at 15 months among young people with emerging severe mental illness.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

David FowlerORCID logo, Clio BerryORCID logo, Joanne HodgekinsORCID logo, Robin BanerjeeORCID logo, Garry BartonORCID logo, Rory Byrne, Timothy Clarke, Rick Fraser, Kelly GrantORCID logo, Kathryn GreenwoodORCID logo, Caitlin NotleyORCID logo, Sophie ParkerORCID logo, Lee Shepstone, Jon WilsonORCID logo & Paul French.

David Fowler 1,2,*, Clio Berry 1,2,3, Joanne Hodgekins 4,5, Robin Banerjee 1, Garry Barton 6, Rory Byrne 7, Timothy Clarke 5, Rick Fraser 2, Kelly Grant 6, Kathryn Greenwood 1,2, Caitlin Notley 4, Sophie Parker 7, Lee Shepstone 4, Jon Wilson 5, Paul French 7,8

1 School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton and Hove, UK
2 Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton and Hove, UK
3 Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton and Hove, UK
4 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
5 Research and Development Department, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
6 Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
7 Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
8 Research and Innovation Department, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email: d.fowler@sussex.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document