Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study confirmed evidence was lacking about the optimal mode of delivery for women in preterm labour and found agreement that a trial should be conducted.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jane E Norman 1,*, Julia Lawton 2, Sarah J Stock 2, Dimitrios Siassakos 3, John Norrie 4, Nina Hallowell 5, Sushila Chowdhry 6, Ruth I Hart 2, David Odd 7, Jane Brewin 8, Lucy Culshaw 9, Caroline Lee-Davey 9, Hannah Tebbutt 10, Sonia Whyte 11

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2 Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3 Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
4 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
5 Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
6 School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
7 Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
8 Tommy’s, London, UK
9 Bliss, London, UK
10 , Edinburgh, UK
11 Tommy’s Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jane.e.norman@bristol.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document