Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation was not effective in reducing urinary incontinence in the care home context.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Joanne Booth 1,*, Lorna Aucott 2, Seonaidh Cotton 2, Bridget Davis 1, Linda Fenocchi 3, Claire Goodman 4, Suzanne Hagen 5, Danielle Harari 6, Maggie Lawrence 1, Andrew Lowndes 7, Lisa Macaulay 1, Graeme MacLennan 8, Helen Mason 8, Doreen McClurg 5, John Norrie 9, Christine Norton 10, Catriona O’Dolan 1, Dawn Skelton 1, Claire Surr 11, Shaun Treweek 2

1 School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
2 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
4 Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
5 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
6 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
7 Playlist for Life, Glasgow, UK
8 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
9 Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
11 School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jo.booth@gcu.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document