Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The intervention was acceptable but recruitment was lower than anticipated, and improvement is needed to the rate of early referral to occupational health before a full trial would be feasible.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Vaughan Parsons 1,2, Dorota Juszczyk 1,2, Gill Gilworth 1,2, Georgia Ntani 3,4, Paul McCrone 5, Stephani Hatch 6, Robert Shannon 7, Max Henderson 8, David Coggon 3, Mariam Molokhia 9, Julia Smedley 10, Amanda Griffiths 11, Karen Walker-Bone 3,4, Ira Madan 1,2,*

1 Occupational Health Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
3 MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4 National Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 King’s Health Economics, King’s College London, London, UK
6 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
8 Liaison Psychiatry, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
9 Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
10 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
11 Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

Response by Dr Vaughan Parsons on 26 May 2021 at 12:25 PM
Corrections to published report
Corrections to the report content since publication, please see Response to Report document in the Download report documents tab.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document