Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Preoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placebo in reducing mortality or need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anaemia 10 42 days before elective major abdominal surgery.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Toby Richards 1,2,3,*, Ravishankar Rao Baikady 4, Ben Clevenger 3,11, Anna Butcher 3, Sandy Abeysiri 2,3, Marisa Chau 2,3, Rebecca Swinson 5, Tim Collier 5, Matthew Dodd 5, Laura Van Dyck 5, Iain Macdougall 6, Gavin Murphy 7, John Browne 8, Andrew Bradbury 9, Andrew Klein 10

1 Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
2 Institute of Clinical Trial and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
3 Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
4 The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
5 Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
6 Department of Renal Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
7 NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
8 School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
9 University Department of Vascular Surgery (University of Birmingham), Solihull Hospital, Solihull, UK
10 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
11 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions