Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This review found that the best-quality evidence, across different conditions, estimated that CBT consistently produces a modest benefit in health-related quality of life.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Beth Fordham 1,*, Thavapriya Sugavanam 1, Katherine Edwards 1, Karla Hemming 2, Jeremy Howick 3, Bethan Copsey 1, Hopin Lee 1, Milla Kaidesoja 4, Shona Kirtley 1, Sally Hopewell 1, Roshan das Nair 5,6, Robert Howard 7, Paul Stallard 8, Julia Hamer-Hunt 9, Zafra Cooper 10, Sarah E Lamb 1,11

1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
4 Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
5 Department of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
6 Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
7 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
8 Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
9 Public and patient representative, Oxford, UK
10 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
11 College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document