Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found a trial comparing psychological interventions with antipsychotic medication and a combination treatment in young people with psychosis is feasible with some adaptations to the design.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Anthony P Morrison 1,2,*, Melissa Pyle 1,2, Rory Byrne 1,2, Matthew Broome 3,4,5,6, Daniel Freeman 4,6, Louise Johns 4,6, Anthony James 4,6, Nusrat Husain 2,7, Richard Whale 8, Graeme MacLennan 9, John Norrie 10, Jemma Hudson 9, Sarah Peters 2, Linda Davies 2, Samantha Bowe 1, Jo Smith 11, David Shiers 1,2, Emmeline Joyce 1, Wendy Jones 1,2, Chris Hollis 12, Daniel Maughan 6

1 Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
2 Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
4 Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
6 Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
7 Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
8 Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
9 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
10 Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
11 School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
12 National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document