Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study showed no clinically relevant difference in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation at 52 weeks between surgery and a cast for patients with scaphoid waist fractures.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Joseph Dias 1, Stephen Brealey 2,*, Liz Cook 2, Caroline Fairhurst 2, Sebastian Hinde 3, Paul Leighton 4, Surabhi Choudhary 5, Matthew Costa 6,7, Catherine Hewitt 2, Stephen Hodgson 8, Laura Jefferson 2,9, Kanagaratnam Jeyapalan 1, Ada Keding 2, Matthew Northgraves 2, Jared Palmer 1, Amar Rangan 2,6, Gerry Richardson 3, Nicholas Taub 10, Garry Tew 2,11, John Thompson 10, David Torgerson 2

1 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
2 Alcuin Research Resource Centre Building, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
3 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
4 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
5 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
6 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
8 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
9 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
10 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
11 Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document