Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

A full trial is likely to be feasible to compare different corticosteroid induction regimes, taking account of the views of the children, young people and families when designing a future study.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ashley P Jones 1, Dannii Clayton 1, Gloria Nkhoma 1, Frances C Sherratt 2, Matthew Peak 3, Simon R Stones 4, Louise Roper 2, Bridget Young 2, Flora McErlane 5,6, Tracy Moitt 1, Athimalaipet V Ramanan 7, Helen E Foster 5,6, Paula R Williamson 1, Samundeeswari Deepak 8, Michael W Beresford 9, Eileen M Baildam 3,*

1 Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
2 School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
4 School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
5 Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
6 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
7 Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
8 Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham Children’s Hospital, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
9 Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
* Corresponding author Email: eileen.baildam@alderhey.nhs.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions