Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no benefit of this whole-home, practice development intervention to reduce agitation in care home residents with dementia at 16 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Claire A Surr 1,*, Ivana Holloway 2, Rebecca EA Walwyn 2, Alys W Griffiths 1, David Meads 3, Rachael Kelley 1, Adam Martin 3, Vicki McLellan 2, Clive Ballard 4, Jane Fossey 5,6, Natasha Burnley 1, Lynn Chenoweth 7, Byron Creese 4, Murna Downs 8, Lucy Garrod 5, Elizabeth H Graham 9, Amanda Lilley-Kelley 2, Joanne McDermid 10, Holly Millard 5, Devon Perfect 5, Louise Robinson 11, Olivia Robinson 1, Emily Shoesmith 1, Najma Siddiqi 12,13, Graham Stokes 14, Daphne Wallace 1, Amanda J Farrin 2

1 Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
2 Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
4 University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
5 Psychological Services, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
6 Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
8 Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
9 Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
10 Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King’s College London, London, UK
11 Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
12 Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
13 Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
14 HC One, Darlington, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document