Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no evidence that the bespoke intervention reduced the prevalence of hand dermatitis.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ira Madan 1,2,*, Vaughan Parsons 1,2, Georgia Ntani 3, Alison Wright 4, John English 5, David Coggon 3, Paul McCrone 6, Julia Smedley 7, Lesley Rushton 8, Caroline Murphy 9, Barry Cookson 10, Tina Lavender 11, Hywel Williams 12

1 Occupational Health Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 King’s College London, London, UK
3 Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4 Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
5 Dermatology, Circle Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre, Nottingham, UK
6 Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Occupational Health Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
8 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
9 King’s Clinical Trial Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
10 Medical Microbiology, University College London, London, UK
11 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
12 Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document