Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Women randomised to a single dose of co-amoxiclav were less likely to have confirmed or suspected infection within 6 weeks of giving birth.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Marian Knight 1,*, Virginia Chiocchia 1, Christopher Partlett 1, Oliver Rivero-Arias 1, Xinyang Hua 1, Ursula Bowler 1, James Gray 2, Shan Gray 1, Kim Hinshaw 3,4, Aethele Khunda 5, Philip Moore 2, Linda Mottram 1, Nelly Owino 1, Dharmintra Pasupathy 6, Julia Sanders 7,8, Abdul H Sultan 9, Ranee Thakar 9, Derek Tuffnell 10, Louise Linsell 1, Edmund Juszczak 1

1 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Department of Microbiology, Birmingham Women’s & Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
4 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
5 Department of Women’s Health, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
6 Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
7 School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
8 Department of Women’s Health, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
9 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
10 Department of Women’s Health, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document