Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Abdominal massage was associated with small improvements in neurogenic bowel dysfunction for people with MS that were neither clinically nor statistically significant.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Doreen McClurg, Fiona Harris, Kirsteen Goodman, Selina Doran, Suzanne Hagen, Shaun Treweek, Christine Norton, Maureen Coggrave, John Norrie, Petra Rauchhaus, Peter Donnan, Anton Emmanuel, Sarkis Manoukian & Helen Mason.

Doreen McClurg 1,*, Fiona Harris 2, Kirsteen Goodman 1, Selina Doran 1, Suzanne Hagen 1, Shaun Treweek 3, Christine Norton 4, Maureen Coggrave 4, John Norrie 5, Petra Rauchhaus 6, Peter Donnan 6, Anton Emmanuel 7, Sarkis Manoukian 8, Helen Mason 8

1 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
2 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
3 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Adult Nursing, King’s College London, London, UK
5 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
6 Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
7 National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London, London, UK
8 Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions