Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found no evidence of clinical benefit of including emollient bath additives in the standard management of childhood eczema.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Miriam Santer 1,*, Kate Rumsby 1, Matthew J Ridd 2, Nick A Francis 3, Beth Stuart 1, Maria Chorozoglou 4, Amanda Roberts 5, Lyn Liddiard 2, Claire Nollett 6, Julie Hooper 1, Martina Prude 1, Wendy Wood 7, Emma Thomas-Jones 3, Taeko Becque 1, Kim S Thomas 5, Hywel C Williams 5, Paul Little 1

1 Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2 Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3 Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
4 Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
6 Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff, UK
7 National Institute for Health Research Research Design Service South Central, Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document