Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study demonstrated feasibility across most objectives and although recruitment and retention were lower than planned, strategies to improve them in a full trial were identified.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Kate Radford 1,*, Chris Sutton 2, Tracey Sach 3, Jain Holmes 1, Caroline Watkins 2, Denise Forshaw 2, Trevor Jones 1, Karen Hoffman 4, Rory O’Connor 5, Ruth Tyerman 6, Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza 7, Richard Morris 1, Emma McManus 3, Avril Drummond 1, Marion Walker 1, Lelia Duley 1, David Shakespeare 8, Alison Hammond 9, Julie Phillips 1

1 Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2 Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
3 Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
4 Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
5 Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
6 Community Head Injury Service, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
7 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
8 Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Trust, Preston, UK
9 Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document