Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Although aspects of the HAUS intervention were acceptable, population targeting and the kit itself were problematic, and progress to a full trial is unlikely to be feasible.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Maureen Seguin 1, Catherine Dodds 2, Esther Mugweni 1, Lisa McDaid 3, Paul Flowers 4, Sonali Wayal 1, Ella Zomer 5, Peter Weatherburn 2, Ibidun Fakoya 1, Thomas Hartney 6, Lorraine McDonagh 6, Rachael Hunter 5, Ingrid Young 7, Shabana Khan 8, Nick Freemantle 8, Jabulani Chwaula 9, Memory Sachikonye 10, Jane Anderson 11, Surinder Singh 5, Eleni Nastouli 12, Greta Rait 6,8, Fiona Burns 1,13,*

1 Research Department, Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK
2 Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3 MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
4 School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
5 Research Department, Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
6 National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections, University College London, London, UK
7 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
8 PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
9 BHA for Equality in Health and Social Care, Leeds, UK
10 UK Community Advisory Board, London, UK
11 Centre for the Study of Sexual Health and HIV, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
12 Virology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
13 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: f.burns@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document