Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The trial did not meet one of the three criteria for progression, with recruitment less than half of that planned although once recruited, patient compliance and retention were both high.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Vinidh Paleri 1,2,3,*, Joanne Patterson 4, Nikki Rousseau 4, Eoin Moloney 4, Dawn Craig 4, Dimitrios Tzelis 4, Nina Wilkinson 5, Jeremy Franks 4, Ann Marie Hynes 6, Ben Heaven 4, David Hamilton 4, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano 7, Rachael Donnelly 7, Stewart Barclay 8, Tim Rapley 4, Deborah Stocken 5,9

1 Head and Neck Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
2 Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
3 Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Biostatistics Research group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
7 Department of Radiation Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8 Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
9 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: vinidh.paleri@rmh.nhs.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document