Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

For patients with stable chronic conditions in primary care, there is some evidence to suggest that 3-month prescriptions are less costly overall and associated with better adherence than 28-day prescriptions.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Céline Miani 1, Adam Martin 1,2, Josephine Exley 1,*, Brett Doble 3,4, Ed Wilson 3, Rupert Payne 5, Anthony Avery 6, Catherine Meads 1,7, Anne Kirtley 1,8, Molly Morgan Jones 1, Sarah King 9

1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
2 Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4 Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
6 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
7 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
8 Strategy Division, Wellcome Trust, London, UK
9 Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jexley@rand.org

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions