Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study does not support the use of 24 hour urine samples in predicting severe pre-eclampsia and the most cost-effective option was spot albumin creatinine ratio.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jason Waugh 1,*, Richard Hooper 2, Edmund Lamb 3, Stephen Robson 4, Andrew Shennan 5, Fiona Milne 6, Christopher Price 7, Shakila Thangaratinam 2, Vladislav Berdunov 2, Jenn Bingham 8

1 The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
3 East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
4 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Women’s Academic Health Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
6 Lay representative, ,
7 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
8 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions