Journals Library

Advanced

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}

View Project

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

In previously untreated RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer, adding either cetuximab or panitumumab to chemotherapy produced benefits for patients, but neither was likely to be good value for money for the NHS.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Nicola Huxley 1,*, Louise Crathorne 1, Jo Varley-Campbell 1, Irina Tikhonova 1, Tristan Snowsill 1, Simon Briscoe 1, Jaime Peters 1, Mary Bond 1, Mark Napier 2, Martin Hoyle 1

1 Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
2 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
* Corresponding author Email: nicola.huxley@monash.edu

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

© NETSCC