Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

An internet-based weight management programme in primary care achieved a greater initial average weight loss than brief advice sheets and was likely to be cost-effective.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul Little, Beth Stuart, FD Richard Hobbs, Jo Kelly, Emily R Smith, Katherine J Bradbury, Stephanie Hughes, Peter WF Smith, Michael V Moore, Mike EJ Lean, Barrie M Margetts, Christopher D Byrne, Simon Griffin, Mina Davoudianfar, Julie Hooper, Guiqing Yao, Shihua Zhu, James Raftery & Lucy Yardley.

Paul Little 1,*, Beth Stuart 1, FD Richard Hobbs 2, Jo Kelly 1, Emily R Smith 3, Katherine J Bradbury 3, Stephanie Hughes 1, Peter WF Smith 4, Michael V Moore 1, Mike EJ Lean 5, Barrie M Margetts 1, Christopher D Byrne 6, Simon Griffin 7, Mina Davoudianfar 2, Julie Hooper 1, Guiqing Yao 8, Shihua Zhu 8, James Raftery 8, Lucy Yardley 3

1 Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 Centre for Applications of Health Psychology (CAHP), Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4 Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
6 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
7 Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
8 Health Economic Analyses Team (HEAT), Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document