Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Ultrasound was more sensitive but less specific than temporal artery biopsy in diagnosing giant cell arteritis and there is scope for reducing the role of biopsy.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Raashid Luqmani 1,*, Ellen Lee 2, Surjeet Singh 1, Mike Gillett 2, Wolfgang A Schmidt 3, Mike Bradburn 2, Bhaskar Dasgupta 4, Andreas P Diamantopoulos 5, Wulf Forrester-Barker 1, William Hamilton 6, Shauna Masters 1, Brendan McDonald 7, Eugene McNally 1, Colin Pease 8, Jennifer Piper 1, John Salmon 9, Allan Wailoo 2, Konrad Wolfe 10, Andrew Hutchings 11

1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3 Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Medical Centre for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
4 Department of Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK
5 Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway
6 Primary Care Diagnostics, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
7 Department of Neuropathology and Ocular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
8 Department of Rheumatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
9 Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
10 Department of Pathology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK
11 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: raashid.luqmani@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions