Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

This systematic review found that the evidence base for automated tests for cognitive impairment is limited and of poor quality; the history and clinical assessment remain crucial for diagnosis

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rabeea’h W Aslam 1,*, Vickie Bates 1, Yenal Dundar 1,2, Juliet Hounsome 1, Marty Richardson 1, Ashma Krishan 1, Rumona Dickson 1, Angela Boland 1, Eleanor Kotas 1, Joanne Fisher 1, Sudip Sikdar 3,4, Louise Robinson 5,6

1 Liverpool Review and Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2 Community Mental Health Team, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Southport, UK
3 Older Adults Mental Health Team, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Waterloo, Liverpool, UK
4 Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
5 Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Institute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email: r.w.aslam@liverpool.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

    If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

     

    Responses to this report

    No responses have been published.

     

    If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

    Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

    Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

    Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

    By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions