An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Page not found (404)
Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.
Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Toolkit
Study found insufficient evidence to support the routine use of FDG PET-CT in primary colorectal cancer and only a small amount of evidence supporting its use in the pre-operative staging of recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer. Economic evaluation showed that FDG PET/CT as an add-on imaging device is cost-effective in the pre-operative staging of recurrent colon, recurrent rectal and metastatic disease but not primary colon or rectal cancers.
1 Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
2 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
3 Division of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
4 The Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
5 The Main Library, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
6 York Health Economics Consortium, Ltd, The University of York, York, UK
7 Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
8 School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
* Corresponding author Email: fay.crawford@ed.ac.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
Report Content
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
Responses to this report
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document