Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Study found that the most robust results for the prioritisation of patients awaiting coronary revascularisation relate to a strategy employing risk stratification using conventional clinical information together with a single biomarker (estimated glomerular filtration rate)

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

H Hemingway, M Henriksson, R Chen, J Damant, N Fitzpatrick, K Abrams, A Hingorani, M Janzon, M Shipley, G Feder, B Keogh, U Stenestrand, K McAllister, J-C Kaski, A Timmis, S Palmer & M Sculpher.

H Hemingway 1,*, M Henriksson 2,3, R Chen 1, J Damant 1, N Fitzpatrick 1, K Abrams 4, A Hingorani 1, M Janzon 5, M Shipley 1, G Feder 6, B Keogh 7, U Stenestrand 5, K McAllister 1, J-C Kaski 8, A Timmis 9, S Palmer 3, M Sculpher 3

1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, , UK
2 Centre for Medical Technology Assessment, Linköping University, , Sweden
3 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, , UK
4 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, , UK
5 Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, , Sweden
6 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, , UK
7 Department of Health, London, UK
8 Cardiovascular Biology Research Centre, St George’s, University of London, , UK
9 Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document