Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found no difference in favourable functional outcome at 30 days or hospital discharge between initial advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device or tracheal intubation.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jonathan R Benger 1,*, Kim Kirby 1,2, Sarah Black 2, Stephen J Brett 3, Madeleine Clout 4, Michelle J Lazaroo 4, Jerry P Nolan 5,6, Barnaby C Reeves 4, Maria Robinson 2, Lauren J Scott 4,7, Helena Smartt 4, Adrian South 2, Elizabeth A Stokes 8,9, Jodi Taylor 4,5, Matthew Thomas 10, Sarah Voss 1, Sarah Wordsworth 8,9, Chris A Rogers 4

1 Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
2 Research, Audit and Improvement Department, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
3 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
4 Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
6 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
7 National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, UK
8 Health Economic Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9 National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
10 Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document