Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Subthreshold micropulse laser for diabetic macular oedema with central retinal thickness less than 400µ was equivalent to standard threshold laser but required a slightly higher number of laser treatments.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Noemi Lois 1,*, Christina Campbell 2, Norman Waugh 3, Augusto Azuara-Blanco 4, Mandy Maredza 3, Hema Mistry 5, Danny McAuley 1,6, Nachiketa Acharya 7, Tariq M Aslam 8,9, Clare Bailey 10, Victor Chong 11, Louise Downey 12, Haralabos Eleftheriadis 13, Samia Fatum 14, Sheena George 15, Faruque Ghanchi 16, Markus Groppe 17, Robin Hamilton 18, Geeta Menon 19, Ahmed Saad 20,21, Sobha Sivaprasad 18, Marianne Shiew 22, David H Steel 23,24, James Stephen Talks 25, Paul Doherty 2, Clíona McDowell 2, Mike Clarke 2,4

1 The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit (NICTU), Belfast, UK
3 Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
4 Centre for Public Health, Queens University, Belfast, UK
5 Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
6 The Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
7 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
8 The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK
9 Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
10 Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
11 Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
12 Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Hull, UK
13 King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
14 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
15 Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
16 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, UK
17 Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
18 National Institute for Health and Care Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
19 Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
20 James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
21 Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
22 Hinchingbrooke Hospital North West Anglia NHS Trust, Huntingdon, UK
23 Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK
24 Bioscience Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
25 Newcastle Eye Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document