Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial showed that methenamine hippurate is not inferior to the current standard care of daily low-dose antibiotics in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections in women during 12 months of prophylactic treatment.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Chris Harding 1,2,*, Thomas Chadwick 3, Tara Homer 3, Jan Lecouturier 3, Helen Mossop 3, Sonya Carnell 4, Will King 3, Alaa Abouhajar 4, Luke Vale 3, Gillian Watson 4, Rebecca Forbes 4, Stephanie Currer 4, Robert Pickard 5,, Ian Eardley 6, Ian Pearce 7, Nikesh Thiruchelvam 8, Karen Guerrero 9, Katherine Walton 10, Zahid Hussain 11, Henry Lazarowicz 12, Ased Ali 13

1 Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Institute of Cellular Medicine, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
7 Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
8 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
9 Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
10 Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
11 The Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK
12 Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, formerly The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
13 Urology Department, Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document