Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

One session treatment was non-inferior to multi-session CBT when using the Behavioural Avoidance Task measure and was also found highly likely to be cost saving.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Barry Wright 1,2,*, Lucy Tindall 1, Alexander J Scott 3, Ellen Lee 4, Katie Biggs 4, Cindy Cooper 4, Penny Bee 5, Han-I Wang 6, Lina Gega 2, Emily Hayward 1, Kiera Solaiman 4, M Dawn Teare 7, Thompson Davis 8, Karina Lovell 5, Jon Wilson 9, Dean McMillan 6, Amy Barr 4, Hannah Edwards 1, Jennifer Lomas 4, Chris Turtle 4, Steve Parrott 6, Catarina Teige 1, Tim Chater 4, Rebecca Hargate 1, Shehzad Ali 2, Sarah Parkinson 1, Simon Gilbody 2, David Marshall 10

1 COMIC Research Team, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
2 Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
3 School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK
4 Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
5 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
7 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
8 Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
9 Central Norfolk Youth Service, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
10 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document