Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Use of a multi-domain decision support tool in care homes led to lower fall rates in older people at 3 6 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Philippa A Logan 1,2,3,4,*, Jane C Horne 1, Frances Allen 1, Sarah J Armstrong 1, Allan B Clark 5,6, Simon Conroy 7, Janet Darby 1, Chris Fox 5, John RF Gladman 1,3,4,8, Maureen Godfrey 1, Adam L Gordon 1,3,4,9, Lisa Irvine 10, Paul Leighton 1, Karen McCartney 1, Gail Mountain 11, Kate Robertson 1, Katie Robinson 1,8, Tracey H Sach 5, Susan Stirling 5,6, Edward CF Wilson 6, Erika J Sims 5,6

1 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2 Community Rehabilitation Team, Nottingham CityCare Partnership, Nottingham, UK
3 National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
4 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
5 Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
6 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
7 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
8 Health Care of the Elderly Directorate, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
9 Medical School, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
10 Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
11 Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Pip.Logan@nottingham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document