Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study recognised deprescribing as a complex intervention that provided support for the safety of structured approaches, but highlighted the need to integrate patient-centred and contextual factors into best practice models.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Joanne Reeve 1,*, Michelle Maden 2, Ruaraidh Hill 2, Amadea Turk 3, Kamal Mahtani 3, Geoff Wong 3, Dan Lasserson 4, Janet Krska 5, Dee Mangin 6, Richard Byng 7, Emma Wallace 8, Ed Ranson 9

1 Academy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
2 Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
4 Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
5 Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Greenwich and Kent, Chatham, UK
6 Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
7 Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
8 Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
9 , Liverpool, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Joanne.Reeve@hyms.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document