Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Current evidence indicates that no STOPP/START intervention in the community, hospitals or nursing homes works better than any other.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli 1, Ian Porter 1, Antoinette Davey 1, Ignacio Ricci Cabello 2, Joanne Greenhalgh 3, Rob Anderson 1,4, Simon Briscoe 1, Carmel Hughes 5, Rupert Payne 6, Emma Cockcroft 7, Jim Harris 1, Charlotte Bramwell 1, Jose M Valderas 1,*

1 Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
2 Gerència d’Atenció Primària de Mallorca, Fundació Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Illes Balears – IdISBa, Mallorca, Spain
3 School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
4 Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement (ESMI) Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
5 School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
6 Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
7 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for the South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
* Corresponding author Email: j.m.valderas@exeter.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions