Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This report concludes that effective scoping of rapid reviews extends beyond information exchange and technical procedures to include social processes such as building relationships and shared understanding.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rob Anderson, Andrew Booth, Alison Eastwood, Mark Rodgers, Liz Shaw, Jo Thompson Coon, Simon Briscoe, Anna Cantrell, Duncan Chambers, Elizabeth Goyder, Michael Nunns, Louise Preston, Gary Raine & Sian Thomas.

Rob Anderson 1,*, Andrew Booth 2, Alison Eastwood 3, Mark Rodgers 3, Liz Shaw 1, Jo Thompson Coon 1,4, Simon Briscoe 1, Anna Cantrell 2, Duncan Chambers 2, Elizabeth Goyder 2, Michael Nunns 1, Louise Preston 2, Gary Raine 3, Sian Thomas 3

1 Exeter Health Services and Delivery Research Evidence Synthesis Centre, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
2 Sheffield Health Services and Delivery Research Evidence Synthesis Centre, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3 York Health Service and Delivery Research Evidence Synthesis Centre, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
4 National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Devon, Cornwall and Somerset, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions