Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Socioeconomic and health-care factors explain the higher risk of diabetes and poorer health outcomes, including mortality, in people with severe mental illness compared to people with diabetes alone.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jennie Lister 1, Lu Han 1, Sue Bellass 2, Jo Taylor 1, Sarah L Alderson 2, Tim Doran 1, Simon Gilbody 1, Catherine Hewitt 1, Richard IG Holt 3,4, Rowena Jacobs 5, Charlotte EW Kitchen 1, Stephanie L Prady 1, John Radford 6, Jemimah R Ride 7, David Shiers 8,9,10, Han-I Wang 1, Najma Siddiqi 1,11,12,*

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
2 Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
5 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
6 Patient and public involvement representative, Keighley, UK
7 Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
8 Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
10 Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
11 Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
12 Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions