Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This pilot trial found no difference in oral health of selected patients seen by dental therapists compared to usual treatment and suggested possible more appropriate designs for a future full evaluation.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul Brocklehurst, Zoe Hoare, Chris Woods, Lynne Williams, Andrew Brand, Jing Shen, Matthew Breckons, James Ashley, Alison Jenkins, Lesley Gough, Philip Preshaw, Christopher Burton, Karen Shepherd & Nawaraj Bhattarai.

Paul Brocklehurst 1,*, Zoe Hoare 1, Chris Woods 1, Lynne Williams 1, Andrew Brand 1, Jing Shen 2, Matthew Breckons 2, James Ashley 3, Alison Jenkins 1, Lesley Gough 4, Philip Preshaw 5,6, Christopher Burton 7, Karen Shepherd 8, Nawaraj Bhattarai 2

1 School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
2 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3 Woodlands Dental Practice, Liverpool, UK
4 Public Health England, Chester, UK
5 Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, , Singapore
6 Faculty of Dentistry, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
7 School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
8 Patient and public involvement representative, Bangor, UK
* Corresponding author Email: p.brocklehurst@bangor.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions