Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was considerable variation in hardware, software and use of electronic health records and limited evidence of their potential being realised to transfer information, support decision-making or change patient care.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Alison Porter 1,*, Anisha Badshah 2, Sarah Black 3, David Fitzpatrick 4, Robert Harris-Mayes 5, Saiful Islam 1, Matthew Jones 1, Mark Kingston 1, Yvette LaFlamme-Williams 6, Suzanne Mason 7, Katherine McNee 3, Heather Morgan 8, Zoe Morrison 9, Pauline Mountain 5, Henry Potts 10, Nigel Rees 6, Debbie Shaw 11, Niro Siriwardena 12, Helen Snooks 1, Rob Spaight 11, Victoria Williams 1

1 Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
2 Department of Human Resources and Organisational Behaviour, University of Greenwich, London, UK
3 South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
4 Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
5 Independent service user, , UK
6 Pre-Hospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Swansea, UK
7 School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
8 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
9 Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
10 Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London, UK
11 East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK
12 School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions