Measuring and optimising the efficiency of community hospital inpatient care for older people: the MoCHA mixed-methods study

doi:10.3310/hsdr08010

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Toolkit

View Project

This study found that the efficiency of community hospital wards is comparable with acute hospitals and that modifiable performance factors might lead to potential efficiency savings.

Young J, Hulme C, Smith A, Buckell J, Godfrey M, Holditch C, Grantham J, Tucker H, Enderby P, Gladman J, Teale E & Thiebaud J.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

John Young ¹, Claire Hulme ², Andrew Smith ³, John Buckell ², Mary Godfrey ^1,^*, Claire Holditch ⁴, Jessica Grantham ⁴, Helen Tucker ⁵, Pam Enderby ⁶, John Gladman ⁷, Elizabeth Teale ¹, Jean-Christophe Thiebaud ³

¹ Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
² Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
³ Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁴ NHS Benchmarking Network, Manchester, UK
⁵ Community Hospitals Association, Crowborough, UK
⁶ School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
⁷ University of Nottingham Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: m.godfrey@leeds.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*

Name (title, first name, last name)*

Occupation / Job title*

Affiliation / Employer*

Email*

Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas

Statement of competing interests
We believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.

If yes, please provide details below

Enter response title*

Enter CAPTCHA What is eleven minus two?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

Journals Library

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Toolkit

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Report Content

Responses to this report