Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no survival benefit from a national quality improvement programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Carol J PedenORCID logo, Tim StephensORCID logo, Graham MartinORCID logo, Brennan C KahanORCID logo, Ann ThomsonORCID logo, Kirsty EveringhamORCID logo, David Kocman, Jose LourtieORCID logo, Sharon Drake, Alan GirlingORCID logo, Richard LilfordORCID logo, Kate Rivett, Duncan Wells, Ravi Mahajan, Peter Holt, Fan YangORCID logo, Simon WalkerORCID logo, Gerry RichardsonORCID logo, Sally Kerry, Iain Anderson, Dave MurrayORCID logo, David Cromwell, Mandeep Phull, Mike PW GrocottORCID logo, Julian Bion & Rupert M PearseORCID logo.

Carol J Peden 1, Tim Stephens 2, Graham Martin 3, Brennan C Kahan 4, Ann Thomson 4, Kirsty Everingham 2, David Kocman 3, Jose Lourtie 5, Sharon Drake 5, Alan Girling 6, Richard Lilford 7, Kate Rivett 8, Duncan Wells 9, Ravi Mahajan 10, Peter Holt 11, Fan Yang 12, Simon Walker 12, Gerry Richardson 12, Sally Kerry 4, Iain Anderson 13, Dave Murray 14, David Cromwell 15, Mandeep Phull 2,16, Mike PW Grocott 17,18, Julian Bion 19, Rupert M Pearse 2,*,

1 Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
3 Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
4 Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
5 Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
6 Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
7 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
8 Patient representative, London, UK
9 Patient representative, Buckinghamshire, UK
10 Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
11 Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
12 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
13 Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
14 South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
15 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
16 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queen’s Hospital, Romford, UK
17 National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
18 Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
19 Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email: pearse@qmul.ac.uk
Trial group membership listed in Appendix 1

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions